Iowa Attorney Lawyer

The geschmacklose brouhaha in Massachusetts on gay marriage lies in the fact that most gays and lesbians Americans are law-abiding, steuerzahlenden citizens should be able to enjoy the rights of all other USA — the right to marry.

The hoopla, all places in Massachusetts - home of Congress MP openly gay Barney Frank - proves that even in the most enlightened every corner of this nation strong pretext of individualism, with its Live and let live ethically has been abandoned. We have embraced the religious rights of dictating’s, all of us.

I am still of the opinion that we finally look like, on legal barriers for same-sex unions the same contempt general, we now also those prescribed by a mixture of race. But the years of the transition period are too dangerous to the principles of rotation, equality and freedom, and it is doubtful that the Constitution is to survive, “traditional values” rush intact.

The conservative Republicans are reveling in the prospect demagoging on this topic during an election year. According to a report Newhouse News, a memo, researchers opinion Republican Richard Wirthlin called for a constitutional amendment banning homosexual marriage “, an ideal corner.” President Bush has already refined statements in support of an amendment to the federal decree of marriage, while most Democratic presidential contenders have been left in the uncomfortable situation of trying to explain the difference between civil unions — that support them - and homosexuals - Marriage - which is not.

In an anesthetic glorification of substance over form, it seems found in the “m” word. Of course, Gay of equal rights, not to mention its 20 years monogamen relations with children raised and College, a “marriage”.

But the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts had the right to reject the “Civil Association” compromise. Given that the majority said: “The history of our nation has demonstrated that separate is seldom, if ever the same.”

I wanted whats up another year. Like the presidential race hits high this spring, couples gays and lesbians from all regions of the USA the possibility to travel to say, Massachusetts, its legal form “I am.”

There would be nothing better for the cause of gay rights (and Democrats), when hundreds of marriages took place in Massachusetts, the new spouse marked quiet - very low - still in their country of origin.

But that will not happen. Chaotic of human life. Some people want to marry, divorce, child custody and property disputes. It is tragedies: diseases surrogacy medical issues and deaths increase, that questions of inheritance. All these desperate situations landed in the courts for the resolution and all responses are still to be seen whether the spouses are married or not.

If the courts in those countries - such as Florida and 37 others - the law categorically says it not recognize same-sex marriages, how to treat these couples married or single? The legal commentators have been proposed, much will depend on the interpretation of the Constitution of the full Faith and Credit clause indicating that the States to respect and implementation of laws and decisions of other states.